The preterist interpretation of scripture regards the book of revelation as a symbolic picture of firstcentury conflicts, not a. Preterism has always been a minority view of the church in interpreting the book of revelation there are some ancient writers who refer to nero as the beast of revelation but it is only in a cursory manner. The imagery of the cosmic battle in heaven and on earth makes. A preterist responds to four views of revelation probe. You can find my first blog on the preterist view here. But there is compelling evidence in the writings of the church fathers that the book of revelation was written approximately 25 years after the events surrounding the destruction of jerusalem in a. In order to apply this period to history from the time of john to that of the interpreter, the 1260 days of the time period. Why preterism is not an accurate interpretation of bible.
According to this view, revelation does not contain prophecies of specific historical events. This literary style is ancient poetry that wrapsup real events in poetic symbolism to give these events meaning. He argues that this is a position which, when held with consistency, denies all modern relevance. The historicist view teaches that the book of revelation is a symbolic presentation of church history beginning in the. The term preterism comes from the latin praeter, meaning past. As the first century nears its close 7 historical churches are addressed. The preterist interpretation of revelation holds that the events spoken of in this book were all specifically fulfilled in the first century. Preterism denies the future prophetic quality of the book of revelation. Each roman legion carried and was represented by a zodiac sign. As a reminder the preterist view believes mostly everything in the book of revelation happened within the first century.
Hundreds of preterist books, ebooks, video and audio resources are available, with many. Preterism comes from a latin word meaning, gone by, or past. The historicist view sees revelation as a record of the course of history from the time of the apostles to. Was the preterist interpretation of revelation invented by.
Historical setting of the book of revelation youtube. This view has precedent in the early church, but it did not become widespread until the nineteenth. An evangelical preterist interpretation of revelation in the last disciple series. Nero fits the bill of anti christ in my book, however i think history shows that its. Four views on the book of revelation explores the four main views in which revelation is understood.
Preterists insist on an early date for the book of revelation to tie it into the 70 a. Following the precedent set in the book of joel, the locusts in this chapter are an invading army. So begins the book of revelation, one of the most challenging books of the bible 3. But one difficulty i have with preterist view of revelation is that. Preterist view of the beast with the wounded head the book of revelation is apocalyptic language. Many of the studies listed at the top of this page are rather lengthy, and numerous. The preterist viewpoint wants to take seriously the historical interpretation of revelation by relating it to its original author and audience. Four views on the book of revelation counterpoints. Josephus and the book of revelation nine case studies 2. This is known as the quick fix of 96 for if revelation was written under domitians reign then the preterist view has a problem. The fourth major approach to the book is the idealist or symbolic approach. Futurists contend it was written around 90 100 ad while preterists contend it was written before 70 ad.
According to preterism, all prophecy in the bible is really history. This is the prevailing view among modern scholars who arent aligned with orthodox christianity. John henten wrote his comments almost a century before the publication of alcasars commentary. Something is terribly wrong with traditional views of bible prophecy.
Whether among churches of christ or not, the common view that is held by the clear majority of writers is the late date. Preterism holds that the contents of revelation constitute a prophecy of events that were fulfilled in the 1st century. The vast majority of christians find the full preterist interpretation of biblical. The preterist view the term preterist comes from the latin word praeteritus, which means, gone by. However the book of revelation is a book of warning to the 7 churches of. A critique of the preterist view of soon and near in revelation. Preterism is the view that the events spoken about in matthew 24 and the book of revelation have been largely or completely fulfilled in the events leading up to and surrounding the destruction of jerusalem by the romans in a. Gentry opens the discussion with a preterist argument. This introductory lecture examines the historical setting suggested by that. They point out incorrectly that revelation was written in 95 or 96 a. Of particular importance is the argument that the end time prophecies of. Most preterists1 believe that the book of revelation speaks to particular circumstances and events that were fulfilled within the lifetime of the. The fact is the book of revelation was written before before jerusalem fell as hyper creedalist ken gentry shows in his book.
One of the problems the historicist view encounters is that the events of the book of revelation appear to be clustered within a relatively short time period rev. The preterist approach to revelation the unfolding of biblical. Some leading theologians and christian spokesmen have had the following to say about the book and the preterist view. Chapter 17 of revelation provides helpful references that can guide our exploration of the precise timing of the book. The preterist approach to revelation the unfolding of. There is an immense amount of research and historical knowledge necessary in order to understand the book of revelation from a preterist perspective, and i believe this fact alone accounts for its undeserved obscurity as well as the great deal of diversity of interpretations of various verses in the book of revelation. For the preterist view to work, the book of revelation has to have been written sometime prior to a. The format for the main body of revelation, chapters 4 through 19, consists of four columns for the four major views.
Revelation speaks of things that are already history. An evangelical preterist interpretation of revelation in the last. Kenneth gentry is an ordained presbyterian minister and author who, like gary demar and david lowman, is a partialpreterist. Preterists believe the dating of the book of revelation is of vital importance and that it was written before the destruction of jerusalem in ad 70. We here at ipa have reprinted it, and it is available here in our bookstore. Since the destruction of jerusalem did not involve the wholesale destruction of sea life revelation 16. Little gems from our study of the book of revelation. Gentry postulates that soon implies an immediacy of the coming events foretold later in the writing. On page 160 of his newest book titled navigating the book of revelation. The preterist movement essentially teaches that all the endtimes. This literary style is ancient poetry that wrapsup real. Even in revelation 12 which largely addresses heavenly events in a symbolic fashion, there is still a literal, visible fulfillment to this vision.
This book allows proponents of each of the four major interpretive views on revelation to present an overview from their perspective. Since the temple and city were both destroyed in 70 a. The preterist view of the end times is based on a symbolic view of the book of revelation that holds most of its prophecies have already been fulfilled. Barton payne, for one, rejects the preterist limiting of the range of the books applicability to the 1st christian century. This lecture offers a summary of the major aspects of the view usually called preterist. Internal comes from within revelation itself and is therefore the most important kind of evidence. Popular preterism books meet your next favorite book. One of the most intriguing books of the bible is the book of revelation. They will identify a lot of the judgments to the destruction of jerusalem. Gumerlock, writing in his book revelation and the first century, states that luis alcasars commentary on revelation, published in 1614, was not the first to take a preterist approach to the main body of the apocalypse chs. The preterist view teaches that the events recorded in the book of revelation were largely fulfilled in seventy a. According to the preterist approach, most of the prophecies in the book of revelation were fulfilled not long after john wrote.
Traditionally, the book of revelation has been dated near the end of the first century, around a. Today we pick up their view in chapter 6 of revelation. Seven brief points which prove the full preterist view of. Preterism denies the future, literal fulfillment of most of its predictions, focusing instead on allegory and symbolism. An interesting eschatological view from a preterist perspective. An examination and refutation of preterism always be ready. The four views and their proponents are 1 the preterist view, by kenneth l. A major point of contention which greatly divides the futuristic interpretation of the book of revelation verses the preterist view that revelation is history to us is when the book was written.
Wallace held what is today known as the preterist view of the book of revelation. Much of the recent interest in the preterist view can be attributed. The book refers to events that were fulfilled in the first century a. The fact is the book of revelation was written before before jerusalem. It is the first book that many people new to the bible want to study, while it is often neglected by. The interactive counterpoints forum allows each author not only to present his view, but also to offer brief commentary on other views presented. Preterists, in common with futurists, believe that the book of revelation predicts the future albeit, in the case of preterism, the relative futurewhat was yet future from the. Iam just listening to his studies mp3 on revelation, and iam becoming more and more convince of the the partialpreterist view of revelation. Clearly john outlasted all the other apostles by more than a few years and is given the final book of the bible, the revelation of jesus christ rev. Full preterism gospel eschatology we offer the most indepth book and articles defending the full preterist view of bible prophecy. Special studies on important issues, gentry notes several parallels between the structure of ezekiel and how john organizes the book of revelation. In the following preterist bible commentary on revelation 9 the reader will be exposed to overwhelming evidence that the earthly reflection of the locusts of revelation 9 are roman soldiers and the general titus is the human reflection of apollyon.
This definitely limits the events of matthew 24 and revelation 11 to the forty odd year period following jesus ascension. It understands the majority of prophecies in revelation 422 as being. The partialpreterist commentarys on the book of revelation. The fully developed preterist view did not come until after the reformation when the bible proliferated in. I also looking foreward toward the revelation project of kenneth gentry. The book of revelation partial preterism the preterist. There are two kinds of evidence regarding the composition of the apocopypse, internal evidence and external evidence. According to the preterist view of the end times, chapters 618 of revelation are highly symbolic, not describing any literal events.
The word preter comes from latin, meaning past, so this view contends that revelation is essentially a view of the past. The preterist interpretation of scripture regards the book of revelation as a symbolic picture of firstcentury conflicts, not a description of what will occur in the end times. Some writers, however, have advanced the preterist from a latin word meaning that which is past view, contending that the apocalypse was penned around a. The lynchpin to understanding the preterist approach to interpreting revelation is in the word soon, found in the opening verse of the book rev. What is the preterist view of the book of revelation. The theme of this commentary is to show that revelation is not a book of empty symbols as is often supposed in preterist circles. Books and ebooks international preterist association. According to this view, revelation does not contain prophecies of. Russell 18161895 published a book in 1878 entitled, the parousia. I also gonne order both, and maybe in the future also the 3rd one.
450 1567 1523 350 883 808 1495 158 190 539 338 566 870 891 924 50 1229 1455 386 1136 595 514 299 904 888 1005 911 246 961 820 157 599 1376 1065 1106 1484 1267 1132 1498 1050 582 1418 141 110